Analytics Platform: An Evolution from Data Lake

Analytics Platform

Having built a Data Lake for your company’s analytical needs, there soon will arise new use cases, that cannot be easily covered with the Data Lake architecture I covered in previous posts, like Apache HAWQ™: Building an easily accessable Data Lake. You will need to adapt or enhance your architecture to become more flexible. One way to make this flexibility happens, is to transform your Data Lake into an Analytics Platform.

Definition of an Analytics Platform

An Analytics Platform is a platform that provides all kind of services needed for building data products. This often exceeds the functionality of a pure RDBMS or even a Data Lake based on Apache HAWQ™. There are data products that have more requirements than a SQL inferface. Reporting and basic analysis are addressed by this setup, but products dealing with predictions or recommendations often have different needs. An Analytics Platform provides flexibility in the tools used. There can be, for example, a Apache HAWQ™ setup and at the same time an environment for running Tensorflow applications.

Using existing parts: Multi-colored YARN

When you are running a Hadoop Cluster™, you are already familiar with a resource manager. This manager is YARN. With YARN you can already deploy Linux Containers, and support for Docker containers has already progressed pretty far (YARN-3611). Building complex applications and managing them with YARN is called Multi-colored YARN by Hortonworks.
Following through on this idea you will have a cluster with just some central services installed directly on bare metal. You will deploy the rest in containers, as shown in the images below.

Analytics Platform
Analytics Platform based on YARN and Docker

The example makes use of Kubernetes and Docker for virtualization and provides the following services on bare meta, since they are needed by most applications:

  • Ambari
  • Kuberneted
  • YARN
  • ZooKeeper
  • HDFS

Especially the HDFS is important as a central services. This makes it possible for all applications to access the some data. The Picture above shows, that there can be several instances of a Hadoop distribution. This is possible even in different version. So the platform allows for multi tenancy, while all instances are still processing the same data.

Development changes

Having an Analytics Platform makes the development of data products easier. There always was the problem of developing a product on a sample of the data, when you used development and staging systems, as decribed by me here. In same cases these did not contain all possibly combinations of data. This could result in error after a deployemnt on the production environment. Even going through all development and staging could not change this. This new approach allows you to deploy all three systems on the same data. So there you can account for all data induced errors on the development and staging systems already.
You can even become more agile in your development process. The picture below shows an example deployment process, that uses this system.

Analytics Platform: Deployment Process


Moving from a pure Data Lake to an Analytics Platform give you are flexibility and helps in the development of data products. Especially since you can develop on the same data as is available on production. Of course it brings more complexity to an already complex environment. But since it is possible to keep YARN as resource manager and move to a more agile way of development and deployment, it might be worth considering. Once Multi-Colored YARN is finished, it will be easier to make this happen.

Building a Productive Data Lake: How to keep three systems in sync

Three Systems for save Development

When you are building a productive Data Lake it is important to have at least three environments:

  • Development: for development, where “everything” is allowed.
  • Staging: for testing changes in a production like environment.
  • Production: Running your tested and productive data applications

With these different environments comes the need to keep data structures in sync. You need to find a way to change each system in a controlled way, when it is time to deploy some changes. There are differences in how to manage data structures, depending on where in data processing they occur. Theses differences we split into the parts “Data Entry to Staging” and “Core and Presentation”. I wi

Managing different data structures in the three systems of your Productive Data Lake

As all three systems can be have different data structures, using tools to make this easier is important. Different Apache Avro™ schema versions are managed by a publishing them to a tool called Apache Avro™ Schema Service of which there also also three instances. By publishing changes first on the development, then staging, then production system, we make sure, only tested data structures are deployed to the Production Data Lake. Each change to a schema belongs to a version number, so rolling back to an earlier state, in case of an error is possible.
Evolving our data structures not contained in Apache Avro™ schemas, we use tables managing all meta information.

Data Structures from Entry to Staging

Apache Avro™ is a good way to manage evolving data structures, as I explained here. Once the data is available in Apache Hive™ mapping the AVRO data types to those of your Productive Data Lake system is necessary. We use Apache HAWQ™ as base of our Data Lake. So we map the AVRO data types to HAWQ data types. To keep this as effortless as possible, we reuse attribute names as often as possible. If an attribute, like “user_id” is occuring in different schemas and has the same meaning, then we just reuse it. So the mapping table does not contain an entry for each column of each schema, but only for distinct ones. Considering more than 100 schema with on average 10 attributes, this helps in keeping maintanence down. In the table below is an example, of this mapping.

Schema FieldnameAVRO datatypeHAWQ datatype

Data Strucutes for Core and Presentation

A totally different challenge is it, to manage the data structures after data entry. There need to occur transformations, for technical and business user benefit. This can mean other attributes / column names or a splitting or joining of data from one schema into different tables. These tables here again can evolve. Evolving database tables is a pain, since you cannot, in most cases just drop the table and recreate the new one. Here the processing power of Apache HAWQ™ comes into play, as we can exactly do that now. In most cases, at least for transactional data, we just reload the whole table, during the daily batch process. So we manage all table definitions in tables. They contain all table and column attributes, as well as a version number. This makes rolling back possible.

Example of table definitions:

Schema NameTable NamePartitioneddistributed bydropableVersion
corerel_user_purchaseuser_id, purchase_idtrue4.0

Exmaple of column definitions:

Schema NameTable NameColumn NameData TypeData Type LengthVersion

Automation of data structure deployment.

After defining all the meta data concerning the data structures, we need a way to automate this. For this I created a Java programm using all the information from schema definitions and tables for data type mappings and table definitions. This programm runs on any of the three environments and also take in consideration the version it should create. This only works, if no one can create or change table information manually. So the programm first deploys changes to the data structure on the development system. If it works there and all changes are ready to be deployed on the staging system, run the programm in this environment. With the version numbers defined besides each change, it is possible to run version 5.0 on production, version 5.1 on staging and version 5.2 on development if neccessary.


This way is a possibility to make data structure evolution easier and keep three different systems in sync. It is most important to make sure, that there are no manual changes to the data structure. This approach works nicely, if you can drop and recreate all tables without hesitation. If that is not the case, you can still define your tables this way, just make sure they are not dropped automatically when the programm runs. Having all definitions in one place and being able to automatically deploy the tables and the changes, with version control, can be a great help. This way no one has to remember to create new tables manually in either system. So errors due to missing tables or columns are minimized which is good if you create a Productive Data Lake, where errors affect data products needed by other products of your company.

Apache HAWQ: Building an easily accessable Data Lake

Apache HAWQ for Data Lake ArchitectureData Lake vs Datawarehouse

The Data Lake Architecture is an up and coming approach to making all data accessible through several methods, be that in real-time or batch analysis. This includes unstructured data as well as structured data. In this approach the data is stored on HDFS and made accessible by several tools, including:

All of these tools have advantages and disadvantages when used to process data, but all of them combined make your data accessible. This is the first step in building a Data Lake. You have to have your data, even schemaless data accessible to your customers.
A classical Datawarehouse on the opposite only contains structured data, that is at least preproccessed and has a fixed schema. Data in a classical Datawarehouse is not the raw data entered into the system. You need a seperate staging area for tranformations. Usually this is not accessible for all consumers of your data, but only for the Datawarehouse developers.

Data Lake Architecture using Apache HAWQ

It is a challenge to build a Data Lake with Apache HAWQ, but this can be overcome on the design part. One solution to build such a system can be seen in then picture below.

Data Entry

To make utilization of Apache HAWQ possible the starting point is a controlled Data Entry. This is a compromise between schemaless and schematized data. Apache AVRO is a way to do this. Schema evolution is an integral part of AVRO and it provides structures to save unstrcutured data, like maps and arrays. A separate article about AVRO will be one of this next topics here, to explain schema evolution and how to make the most of it.
Data structured in schema can then be pushed message wise into a messaging queue. Chose a queue that fits your needs best. If you need secure transactions RabbitMQ may be the right choice. Another option is Apache Kafka.

Pre-aggregating Data

Processing and storing single message on HDFS is not an option, so there is need of another system to aggregate messages before storing them on HDFS. For this a software project called Apache Nifi is a good choice. This system comes with processors that make things like this pretty easy. It has a processor called MergeContent that merges single AVRO messages and removes all headers but one, before writing them to HDFS.
If those messages are still not above the HDFS blocksize, there is the possibility to read messages from HDFS and merge them into larger files still.

Making data available in the Data Lake

Use Apache Hive to make data accessible from AVRO format. HAWQ could read the AVRO files directly, but Hive handles schema evolution in a more effective way. For example, if there is the need to add a new optional field to an existing schema, add a default value for that field and Hive will fill entries from earlier messages with this value. So if HAWQ now accesses this Hive table it automatically reads the default value for field added later with default values. It could not do this by itself. Hive also has a more robust way of handling and extracting keys and values from map fields right now.

Data Lake with SQL Access

All data is available in Apache HAWQ now. This enables tranformations using SQL and making all of your data accessible by a broad audience in your company. SQL skills are more common than say Spark programming in Java, Scala or PySpark. From here it is possible to give analysts access to all of the data or building data marts for single subjects of concern using SQL transformations. Connectivity to reporting tools like Tableau is possible with a driver for Postgresql. Even advanced analytics are possible, if you install Apache MADlib on your HAWQ cluster.

Using Data outside of HAWQ

It is even possible to use all data outside of HAWQ, if there is a need for it. Since all data is available in AVRO format, accessing it by means of Apache Spark with Apache Zeppelin is also possible. Hive queries are possible too, since all data is registered there using external tables, which we used for integration into HAWQ.
Accessing results of such processing in HAWQ is possible too. Save the results in AVRO format for integration in the way described above or use “hawq register” to access parquet files directly from HDFS.


Using Apache HAWQ as base of a Data Lake is possible. Just take some contraints into consideration. But entering data with semi-structured with AVRO format also saves work later when you process the data. The main advantage is, that you can utilize SQL as an interface to all of you data. This enables many people in your company to access your data and will help you on your way to Data Driven decisions.

Apache HAWQ: Full SQL and MPP support on HDFS

Apache HAWQPivotal ported their massively parallel processing (MPP) database Greenplum to Hadoop and made it open source as an incubating project at Apache, called Apache HAWQ. This bring together full ANSI SQL with MPP capabilities and Hadoop integration.

The integration in an existing Hadoop installation is easy, as you can integrate all existing data via external tables. This is done using the pxf API to query external data. This API is customizable, but already brings the most used formats ready made. These include:

To access and store small amounts of data Apache HAWQ has an interface called gpfdist. This enables you to store data outside of your HDFS and still access it within HAWQ to join with the data stored in HDFS. This is especially handy, when you need small tables for dimension or mapping data in Apache HAWQ. This data will then not use a whole block of your HDFS, that is mostly empty.

Apache HAWQ even come integrated with MADlib, also an Apache incubating product, developed by Pivotal. MADlib is a Machine Learning framework, based on SQL. So moving data between different tools for analysing it, is not need anymore. If you have stored your data in Apache HAWQ, you can mine it in the database directly and don’t have to export it, e.g. to a Spark client or tools like Knime or RapidMiner.

MADlib algorithms

MADLib comes with algorithms in the following categories:

  • Classification
  • Regression
  • Clustering
  • Topic Modelling
  • Assocition Rule Mining
  • Descriptive Statistics

By using HAWQ you even can leverage tools like Tableau with real time database connections, which was not satisfactory so far when you used Hive.

Big Data and Data Warehouse Architecture

Further development and new additions to the Hadoop framework, such as Stinger from HortonWorks or Impala from Cloudera try to bridge the gap between traditional EDWH architectures and big data architectures.
Especially initiative with the goal of speeding up Hive and delivering SQL 2011 standard to use on Map / Reduce Hadoop clusters makes this technology usable for developers with a SQL background. This next iteration in Hive optimization also brings an ACID framework with transactions and writeable tables. This is especially useful in data warehouse contexts, for example when you need to add meta data.

With these developments it seems plausible, that Hadoop and with it Big Data as a whole will move from ETL plattform for traditional EDWH architectures using traditional database systems, to a unified plattform, where Hadoop stores all data from raw unstructured data to structured data from the companies transactional systems and the meta data created in for reporting purposes. So access to all data would be given in the same system and query-able with SQL.
Standard reporting and deeper analysis on all data could then be accessed on the same system, so that all analysts and traditional BI developers share one platform and a better understanding of all the data needed and used in the data warehouse system.

I already did a benchmark on query speed for MySQL, Stinger and Impala here and will update this, once is out.